The jury consisting of a chairman, the subject matter experts and
experts criticize the design of the architect. Now it comes in
in Switzerland, particularly for larger construction projects, and more often are
that subject matter experts, so the investors, represented in greater numbers than the
experts, architects. There are
these cases the economic criteria are often rated higher than the architectural
.
occurs in today's economy, the investor also plays back from a project
competition and the winning project over to
another client. The architectural criticism of the jury is more and more
a farce. A case example is the award given by the SBB
study commissioned WestLink 2009th As the jury was dominated by
employees of SBB and KPMG. The auditor has folded after
decidedly study contract from the project.
one is interested in architecture should not take part in such competitions
you. But as in exactly these projects prestige and
money is at stake, this will do a little. A ban would
the solution.
If you are interested in money should be much higher for such competitions
can compensate, as a satisfaction for the ruling
arbitrariness.
0 comments:
Post a Comment